Re: [Intel IOMMU 10/10] Iommu floppy workaround

On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 11:42:22PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 14:37:11 -0700 "Keshavamurthy, Anil S" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Bit weird that this was implemented in the header like that.
Sorry, it is my mistake as I understood thus from your previous
code review comment.
> 
> How about this?  (Also contains rather a lot of obvious style fixes)
Yup, looks good.

-Anil
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [Intel IOMMU 00/10] Intel IOMMU support, take #2
    • From: "Keshavamurthy, Anil S" <[email protected]>
  • [Intel IOMMU 10/10] Iommu floppy workaround
    • From: "Keshavamurthy, Anil S" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Intel IOMMU 10/10] Iommu floppy workaround
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [Intel IOMMU 00/10] Intel IOMMU support, take #2
• Next by Date: Re: Is it time for remove (crap) ALSA from kernel tree ?
• Previous by thread: Re: [Intel IOMMU 10/10] Iommu floppy workaround
• Next by thread: [Intel IOMMU 08/10] DMAR fault handling support
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]