Re: [Intel IOMMU 00/10] Intel IOMMU support, take #2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 08:48:04AM -0700, Keshavamurthy, Anil S wrote:

> Our initial benchmark results showed we had around 3% extra CPU
> utilization overhead when compared to native(i.e without IOMMU).
> Again, our benchmark was on small SMP machine and we used iperf and
> a 1G ethernet cards.

Please try netperf and a bigger machine for a meaningful comparison :-)
I assume this is with e1000?

> Going forward we will do more benchmark tests and will share the
> results.

Looking forward to it.

Cheers,
Muli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux