Re: -Os versus -O2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Also note that whether or not it is profitable to unroll
a particular loop depends largely on how "hot" that loop
is, and GCC doesn't know much about that if you don't feed
it profiling information (it can guess a bit, sure, but it
can guess wrong too).

actually, what you are saying is that the compiler can't know enough to figure out how to optimize for speed. it will just do what you tell it to, either unroll loops or not.

It bases its optimisation decisions on the options you give
it, the profile feedback information you either or not gave
it, and a whole bunch of heuristics.

this argues that both O2 and Os are incorrect for a project to use and instead the project needs to make it's own decisions on this.

For optimal performance, you need to fine-tune options yes,
per file (or per function even!)

if this is the true feeling of the gcc team I'm very disappointed, it feels like a huge step backwards.

I speak only for myself.  However this is the only way it _can_
be, the compiler isn't clairvoyant.  Some of the heuristics sure
could use some tuning, but they stay heuristics.


Segher

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux