Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions

Humm...  Right, so __builtin_offsetof() needs special treatment too.
Oh, bugger.  Is
	offsetof(struct foo, a.x[n])
a documented extension?

It is.  See  info gcc -> C Extensions -> Offsetof


Segher

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
    • From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
    • From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
    • From: Segher Boessenkool <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
    • From: Al Viro <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Linux v2.6.22-rc6
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]