* Serge E. Hallyn ([email protected]) wrote:
> Sigh, as much as I would *like* to stay out of this (I don't
> use modules at all on any system where I can avoid it), won't
> it make development - and especially testing - of new lsms
> much more painful and therefore less likely?
Dev, hopefully not. Testing, well, perhaps.
> I realize there has been a dearth of new LSMs to date, but if
> for instance a new solaris 10 based capability module were written,
> well, people would want to be able to
>
> rmmod capability
> modprobe cap_prm
The problem is it's not necessarily even safe to do rmmod at all.
And modprobe may require extra labelling, or extra checks for
unlabelled objects (perhaps not so much for your example).
thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
