Carlo Wood wrote:
Is it possible that the measurement with "hdparm -tT" returns a higher
value for some setting, but that the over-all real-life performance
drops?
IN THEORY, RAID performance should /increase/ due to additional queued
commands available to be sent to the drive. NCQ == command queueing ==
sending multiple commands to the drive, rather than one-at-a-time like
normal.
But hdparm isn't the best test for that theory, since it does not
simulate the transactions like real-world MD device usage does.
We have seen buggy NCQ firmwares where performance decreases, so it is
possible that NCQ just isn't good on your drives.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
