On Jun 22 2007 20:25, Alexander Wuerstlein wrote:
>+#ifdef CONFIG_SNS_SIGNED
>+#include <linux/sns.h>
>+#endif
>
> #include <asm/uaccess.h>
> #include <asm/mmu_context.h>
>@@ -928,13 +931,21 @@ int prepare_binprm(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
> mode = inode->i_mode;
> if (bprm->file->f_op == NULL)
> return -EACCES;
>+#ifdef CONFIG_SNS_SIGNED
>+ if (mode & S_ISUID)
>+ current->sns_valid_sig = sns_signature_valid(bprm->file);
>+#endif
>
> bprm->e_uid = current->euid;
> bprm->e_gid = current->egid;
>
> if(!(bprm->file->f_path.mnt->mnt_flags & MNT_NOSUID)) {
> /* Set-uid? */
>- if (mode & S_ISUID) {
>+#ifdef CONFIG_SNS_SIGNED_SETUID
>+ if (mode & S_ISUID && current->sns_valid_sig) {
>+#else
>+ if (mode & S_ISUID) {
>+#endif /*SNS_SIGNED_SETUID*/
> current->personality &= ~PER_CLEAR_ON_SETID;
> bprm->e_uid = inode->i_uid;
> }
>@@ -945,7 +956,11 @@ int prepare_binprm(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
> * is a candidate for mandatory locking, not a setgid
> * executable.
> */
>- if ((mode & (S_ISGID | S_IXGRP)) == (S_ISGID | S_IXGRP)) {
>+#ifdef CONFIG_SNS_SIGNED_SETGID
>+ if ((mode & (S_ISGID | S_IXGRP)) == (S_ISGID | S_IXGRP) && current->sns_valid_sig) {
>+#else
>+ if ((mode & (S_ISGID | S_IXGRP)) == (S_ISGID | S_IXGRP)) {
>+#endif /*SNS_SIGNED_SETGID*/
> current->personality &= ~PER_CLEAR_ON_SETID;
> bprm->e_gid = inode->i_gid;
> }
...
That's a lot of unwanted ifdefs!
Jan
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
