On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 03:26:26PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 03:17:27PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Saturday 23 June 2007 13:09, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> > > On Saturday 23 of June 2007, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > > Here's a nickel. Get yourself a real shell.
> > >
> > > POSIX compilant shell isn't real shell?
> >
> > In this case it's not good enough. We're not writing POSIX portable software
> > here, but Linux software where /bin/sh is /bin/bash. Similar to the Linux
> > kernel which is not written in portable ISO C.
I disagree.
> Well, it can also be zsh or pdksh, but I suspect that the code is valid on
> them too.
Not for the latter:
|-*- pdksh -*-
flower:-$ <kernelOops.txt>/dev/null pdksh decodecode
decodecode[40]: : bad substitution
flower:-$
|-*-
I don't want to go further with this OT, just last thing.
It's GNU BaSH *BUG* (addition to being big and slow), if it can't switch
off it's expressly undocumented extentions while run as `/bin/sh'.
____
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
