On Sat, 2007-06-23 at 00:38 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Daniel Walker <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > The two patches have two different objectives, even though they are
> > > related and currently on a 1 to 1 basis. The patches regardless,
> > > should stay separate.
> >
> > I'm not convinced yet .. One more stab?
>
> uhm, i dont think Steve needs to 'convince' you. You have been (once
> again ...) given extensive explanations about a really trivial topic,
> but you keep pushing and demanding very agressively without apparently
> reading the answers. If you dont want to or cannot understand it's
> really your problem to solve, not Steve's ...
Your right Steven doesn't need to convince me. He requested comments and
I gave them, if he or you want to ignore them that's your prerogative.
How can you say I didn't read the answers .. I said "I read this 5
times" ! It doesn't get much more explicit than that .. In fact, my
response was mainly cause I thought his explanation was confusing.. How
can you fault _me_ for that, it's the medium we're using.
It seems like you assume all my emails are "demanding" and "aggressive",
where I'm just asking questions and making comments .. Who am I to be
making demands of anyone ?
<joke>
I DEMAND you do what I say! You better do it or else! I'll force Linus
to ignore you, so you better do it.
</joke>
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
