Re: how about mutual compatibility between Linux's GPLv2 and GPLv3?

> Another law of negotiations --- don't goad people into hardening their
> positions; it helps neither you nor your interests.

That always depends which side you really support, whether you want to
force someone to wedge themselves in an undefendable corner and so on..

Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: how about mutual compatibility between Linux's GPLv2 and GPLv3?
    • From: Theodore Tso <[email protected]>

• References:
  • RE: how about mutual compatibility between Linux's GPLv2 and GPLv3?
    • From: "David Schwartz" <[email protected]>
  • Re: how about mutual compatibility between Linux's GPLv2 and GPLv3?
    • From: Alexandre Oliva <[email protected]>
  • Re: how about mutual compatibility between Linux's GPLv2 and GPLv3?
    • From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
  • Re: how about mutual compatibility between Linux's GPLv2 and GPLv3?
    • From: Theodore Tso <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] schedule BLK_DEV_IDE_SATA for removal
• Next by Date: Re: Oops in a driver while using SLUB as a SLAB allocator
• Previous by thread: Re: how about mutual compatibility between Linux's GPLv2 and GPLv3?
• Next by thread: Re: how about mutual compatibility between Linux's GPLv2 and GPLv3?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]