Re: how about mutual compatibility between Linux's GPLv2 and GPLv3?

On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 01:34:24AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> I take it that removing barriers to cooperation in GPLv3 by default is
> undesirable.  Well, then, what can I say?

That It's All Their[kernel developers'] Fault(tm), of course.

> I tried.  :-(

Or that, indeed.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • how about mutual compatibility between Linux's GPLv2 and GPLv3?
    • From: Alexandre Oliva <[email protected]>
  • Re: how about mutual compatibility between Linux's GPLv2 and GPLv3?
    • From: Bron Gondwana <[email protected]>
  • Re: how about mutual compatibility between Linux's GPLv2 and GPLv3?
    • From: Alexandre Oliva <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Linux Kernel include files
• Next by Date: Re: how about mutual compatibility between Linux's GPLv2 and GPLv3?
• Previous by thread: Re: how about mutual compatibility between Linux's GPLv2 and GPLv3?
• Next by thread: Re: how about mutual compatibility between Linux's GPLv2 and GPLv3?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]