Re: Fix signalfd interaction with thread-private signals

On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> 
> Yeah well... I wanted to have the least surprise path... that is,
> without my patch, signalfd will "sometimes" steal the SIGSEGV depending
> on who races to the lock first

Oh, absolutely. I thought we all agreed that Ben's patch was the right 
thing. It's been merged for some time now (even if it hasn't been merged 
for as long as I initially _thought_, since I had forgotten to apply the 
the first time around ;)

So yes, all my emails have been about the _current_ code. 

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: Fix signalfd interaction with thread-private signals
    • From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
  • Re: Fix signalfd interaction with thread-private signals
    • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>
  • Re: Fix signalfd interaction with thread-private signals
    • From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
  • Re: Fix signalfd interaction with thread-private signals
    • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>
  • Re: Fix signalfd interaction with thread-private signals
    • From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
  • Re: Fix signalfd interaction with thread-private signals
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: Fix signalfd interaction with thread-private signals
    • From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
  • Re: Fix signalfd interaction with thread-private signals
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: Fix signalfd interaction with thread-private signals
    • From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
  • Re: Fix signalfd interaction with thread-private signals
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: Fix signalfd interaction with thread-private signals
    • From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
  • Re: Fix signalfd interaction with thread-private signals
    • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Linux Kernel include files
• Next by Date: Re: This is [Re:] How to improve the quality of the kernel[?].
• Previous by thread: Re: Fix signalfd interaction with thread-private signals
• Next by thread: Re: Fix signalfd interaction with thread-private signals
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]