On Sunday 17 June 2007, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
[ ... ]
> >>>Index: b/drivers/ide/pci/alim15x3.c
> >>>===================================================================
> >>>--- a/drivers/ide/pci/alim15x3.c
> >>>+++ b/drivers/ide/pci/alim15x3.c
> >>>@@ -594,7 +594,7 @@ out:
> >>> * FIXME: frobs bits that are not defined on newer ALi devicea
> >>> */
> >>>
> >>>-static unsigned int __devinit ata66_ali15x3 (ide_hwif_t *hwif)
> >>>+static u8 __devinit ata66_ali15x3(ide_hwif_t *hwif)
> >>> {
> >>> struct pci_dev *dev = hwif->pci_dev;
> >>> unsigned int ata66 = 0;
> >>>@@ -657,7 +657,7 @@ static unsigned int __devinit ata66_ali1
> >>>
> >>> local_irq_restore(flags);
> >>>
> >>>- return(ata66);
> >>>+ return ata66 ? ATA_CBL_PATA80 : ATA_CBL_PATA40;
>
> >> Ahem... I'd think it was about the right time to fix the abomination which
> >>those ata66 and cable_80_pin[2] are, something like this:
>
> >>static unsigned int __devinit ata66_ali15x3 (ide_hwif_t *hwif)
> >>{
> >> struct pci_dev *dev = hwif->pci_dev;
> >> unsigned int cbl = ATA_CBL_PATA40;
> >> unsigned long flags;
> >> u8 tmpbyte, mask = hwif->channel ? 0x02 : 0x01;
> >>
> >> local_irq_save(flags); /* Not sure if it's necessary... */
> >>
> >> if (m5229_revision >= 0xC2) {
> >> /*
> >> * Ultra66 cable detection (from Host View)
> >> * m5229, 0x4a, bit0: primary, bit1: secondary
> >> * 0: 80 pin, 1: 40 pin
> >> */
> >> pci_read_config_byte(dev, 0x4a, &tmpbyte);
> >> /*
> >> * Allow ata66 if cable of current channel has 80 pins
> >> */
> >> cbl = (tmpbyte & mask) ? ATA_CBL_PATA40 : ATA_CBL_PATA80;
> >> } else {
>
> >>[Following code frankly speaking has no business being in this function]
>
> > patch #3/5 already takes care of cable_80_pin[2] part,
>
> I really should have looked thru all the series but lacked the time. :-<
>
> > ata66 part was left as an exercise for the reader ;-)
>
> Hm, now that I've looked at that patch I saw both these things killed.
> What, you don't know your own code? ;-)
It seems that I indeed dealt with ata66 part already... :-)
However I had something different in mind while writing about code gymnastics
- code unrelated to cable detection should be split off from ata66_ali15x3.
Thanks,
Bart
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
