Re: [patch 10/26] SLUB: Faster more efficient slab determination for __kmalloc.

On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 15:22:36 -0700 (PDT)
Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 02:58:48 -0700
> > [email protected] wrote:
> > 
> > > +	BUG_ON(KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE > 256 ||
> > > +		(KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE & (KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE - 1)));
> > 
> > BUILD_BUG_ON?
> > 
> Does not matter. That code is __init.

Finding out at compile time is better.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch 10/26] SLUB: Faster more efficient slab determination for __kmalloc.
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch 00/26] Current slab allocator / SLUB patch queue
    • From: [email protected]
  • [patch 10/26] SLUB: Faster more efficient slab determination for __kmalloc.
    • From: [email protected]
  • Re: [patch 10/26] SLUB: Faster more efficient slab determination for __kmalloc.
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 10/26] SLUB: Faster more efficient slab determination for __kmalloc.
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [rtc-linux] [PATCH 1/2] rtc: add rtc-m41txx driver
• Next by Date: Re: Some thoughts on memory policies
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch 10/26] SLUB: Faster more efficient slab determination for __kmalloc.
• Next by thread: Re: [patch 10/26] SLUB: Faster more efficient slab determination for __kmalloc.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]