Re: libertas (private) ioctls vs. nl80211

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 01:38:47PM -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 19:13 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > I suspect that the probability of your proposal succeeding would be increased
> > > if you could prepare a patch...
> 
> Applied to upstream-fixes branch of libertas-2.6 which is destined for
> 2.6.22; I hope you don't mind that I just added the Signed-off-by for
> you.

Adding a signed off line for a patch that purely removes codes seems
rather pointless to me, but feel free to add it if you care.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux