On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 01:39:29PM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > Can you please try the attached patch? I have compiled it with
CONFIG_ES7000=y
> > and CONFIG_X86_GENERICARCH=n. But don't have any ES7000 machine to
test it.
>
> I actually don't have anything remotely like ES7000 iether. I just
> found the problem while tracking down another randconfig failure.
>
> > Subarch build procedure is not straightforward and this patch adds
to the
> > misery. Please suggest if there is a better way of handling things.
>
> > +/*
> > + * This file also gets compiled if CONFIG_X86_GENERICARCH is set.
Generic
> > + * arch already has got following function definitions
(asm-generic/es7000.c)
> > + * hence no need to define these for that case.
> > + */
> > +#ifndef CONFIG_X86_GENERICARCH
>
> Seems it would be cleaner to figure out some way to build es7000.c for
> if CONFIG_X86_ES7000 is set? Or just move them here all the time?
>
> > ---
linux-2.6.22-rc4-git4/include/asm-i386/mach-es7000/mach_mpparse.h~i386-e
s7000-build-breakage-fix 2007-06-13 22:52:14.000000000 +0530
> > +++
linux-2.6.22-rc4-git4-vivek/include/asm-i386/mach-es7000/mach_mpparse.h
2007-06-13 22:52:14.000000000 +0530
> > @@ -18,6 +18,12 @@ extern int parse_unisys_oem (char *oempt
> > extern int find_unisys_acpi_oem_table(unsigned long *oem_addr);
> > extern void setup_unisys(void);
> >
> > +#ifndef CONFIG_X86_GENERICARCH
> > +extern int acpi_madt_oem_check(char *oem_id, char *oem_table_id);
> > +extern int mps_oem_check(struct mp_config_table *mpc, char *oem,
> > + char *productid);
> > +#endif
>
> It seems that this #ifndef is not needed -- even if there is another
> declaration of these functions that is visible, the signatures should
> match so it should be OK.
>
Compiler does throw warning as one set of functions is static and
other is not.
arch/i386/mach-generic/es7000.c:37: warning: static declaration of
'mps_oem_check' follows non-static declaration
include/asm/mach-es7000/mach_mpparse.h:23: warning: previous declaration
of 'mps_oem_check' was here
arch/i386/mach-generic/es7000.c:50: warning: static declaration of
'acpi_madt_oem_check' follows non-static declaration
include/asm/mach-es7000/mach_mpparse.h:21: warning: previous declaration
of 'acpi_madt_oem_check' was here
Here is the patch that does work - but... I do have warnings that I
haven't noticed initially when compile for ES7000 case:
...
CC arch/i386/kernel/acpi/boot.o
include/asm-i386/mach-es7000/mach_mpparse.h:56: warning:
'mps_oem_check' defined but not used
CC arch/i386/kernel/mpparse.o
...
include/asm-i386/mach-es7000/mach_mpparse.h:35: warning:
'acpi_madt_oem_check' defined but not used
CC arch/i386/kernel/apic.o
...
CC arch/i386/kernel/nmi.o
I'm afraid I will have to do something ugly or ifdef to get rid of
this warning, so I guess I'd rather take yours, Vivec :) since it
compiles and runs cleanly.
Thanks!
--Natalie
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
diff -Naur linux-2.6/arch/i386/mach-es7000/es7000plat.c
linux-2.6-mod/arch/i386/mach-es7000/es7000plat.c---
linux-2.6/arch/i386/mach-es7000/es7000plat.c 2007-06-12
21:16:15.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6-mod/arch/i386/mach-es7000/es7000plat.c 2007-06-17
06:56:49.000000000 -0700
@@ -277,3 +277,11 @@
return;
}
}
+
+void __init
+enable_apic_mode(void)
+{
+ es7000_sw_apic();
+ return;
+}
+
diff -Naur linux-2.6/arch/i386/mach-generic/es7000.c
linux-2.6-mod/arch/i386/mach-generic/es7000.c
--- linux-2.6/arch/i386/mach-generic/es7000.c 2007-06-12
21:16:15.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6-mod/arch/i386/mach-generic/es7000.c 2007-06-17
06:57:20.000000000 -0700
@@ -26,44 +26,6 @@
}
extern void es7000_sw_apic(void);
-static void __init enable_apic_mode(void)
-{
- es7000_sw_apic();
- return;
-}
-
-static __init int mps_oem_check(struct mp_config_table *mpc, char *oem,
- char *productid)
-{
- if (mpc->mpc_oemptr) {
- struct mp_config_oemtable *oem_table =
- (struct mp_config_oemtable *)mpc->mpc_oemptr;
- if (!strncmp(oem, "UNISYS", 6))
- return parse_unisys_oem((char *)oem_table);
- }
- return 0;
-}
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
-/* Hook from generic ACPI tables.c */
-static int __init acpi_madt_oem_check(char *oem_id, char *oem_table_id)
-{
- unsigned long oem_addr;
- if (!find_unisys_acpi_oem_table(&oem_addr)) {
- if (es7000_check_dsdt())
- return parse_unisys_oem((char *)oem_addr);
- else {
- setup_unisys();
- return 1;
- }
- }
- return 0;
-}
-#else
-static int __init acpi_madt_oem_check(char *oem_id, char *oem_table_id)
-{
- return 0;
-}
-#endif
+extern void enable_apic_mode(void);
struct genapic apic_es7000 = APIC_INIT("es7000", probe_es7000); diff
-Naur linux-2.6/include/asm-i386/mach-es7000/mach_apic.h
linux-2.6-mod/include/asm-i386/mach-es7000/mach_apic.h
--- linux-2.6/include/asm-i386/mach-es7000/mach_apic.h 2007-06-12
21:16:18.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6-mod/include/asm-i386/mach-es7000/mach_apic.h
2007-06-17 06:51:48.000000000 -0700
@@ -199,4 +199,6 @@
return cpuid_apic >> index_msb;
}
+extern void enable_apic_mode(void);
+
#endif /* __ASM_MACH_APIC_H */ diff -Naur
linux-2.6/include/asm-i386/mach-es7000/mach_mpparse.h
linux-2.6-mod/include/asm-i386/mach-es7000/mach_mpparse.h
--- linux-2.6/include/asm-i386/mach-es7000/mach_mpparse.h
2007-06-12 21:16:18.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6-mod/include/asm-i386/mach-es7000/mach_mpparse.h
2007-06-17 06:54:54.000000000 -0700
@@ -29,6 +29,38 @@
return 1;
return 0;
}
+
+/* Hook from generic ACPI tables.c */
+static int __init acpi_madt_oem_check(char *oem_id, char *oem_table_id)
+{
+ unsigned long oem_addr;
+ if (!find_unisys_acpi_oem_table(&oem_addr)) {
+ if (es7000_check_dsdt())
+ return parse_unisys_oem((char *)oem_addr);
+ else {
+ setup_unisys();
+ return 1;
+ }
+ }
#endif
+static __init int mps_oem_check(struct mp_config_table *mpc, char *oem,
+ char *productid)
+{
+ if (mpc->mpc_oemptr) {
+ struct mp_config_oemtable *oem_table =
+ (struct mp_config_oemtable *)mpc->mpc_oemptr;
+ if (!strncmp(oem, "UNISYS", 6))
+ return parse_unisys_oem((char *)oem_table);
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
#endif /* __ASM_MACH_MPPARSE_H */
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
