* From: Thomas Gleixner
[]
> Fixup the existing users.
>
> This removes the sysfs entry for the HPET, which is now controlled by
> the clockevents resume code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-davinci/time.c | 2 +
> arch/arm/mach-imx/time.c | 1
> arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/common.c | 2 +
> arch/arm/mach-omap1/time.c | 1
> arch/arm/plat-omap/timer32k.c | 2 +
Testers and users are most likely to run one particular arch on
one particular test bench. If individual patches are arch
separated, i think bisecting will be a little bit easier.
Thus, i would like to propose separate arch patching (x86_64/i386 mainly).
Is it possible to do that? (And even set such check in ``checkpatch''?)
You would say, why? Because current kbuild/kconfig support of builds for
whole tree.
That's because to make download, build, test and debug particular arch
more easily, i'm trying to re-think and re-do some kbuild parts. With
minimum set of files, downloaded with git one can spend less
time/bandwidth for starting testing.
> arch/i386/kernel/apic.c | 3 +
> arch/i386/kernel/hpet.c | 71 ++------------------------------------
> arch/i386/kernel/i8253.c | 26 ++++++-------
> arch/i386/kernel/vmiclock.c | 1
> arch/i386/xen/time.c | 1
Opinions?
> arch/sh/kernel/timers/timer-tmu.c | 1
> arch/sparc64/kernel/time.c | 1
____
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
