Re: raid5: coding style cleanup / refactor

On 6/15/07, Neil Brown <[email protected]> wrote:

Good idea...  Am I asking too much to have separate things in separate
patches?  It makes review easier.

...yeah I got a little bit carried away after the refactoring.  I will
spin the refactoring out into a separate patch and handle the coding
style violations as you suggested.

NeilBrown

Thanks,
Dan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • raid5: coding style cleanup / refactor
    • From: Dan Williams <[email protected]>
  • Re: raid5: coding style cleanup / refactor
    • From: Neil Brown <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [AppArmor 39/45] AppArmor: Profile loading and manipulation, pathname matching
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Introduce compat_u64 and compat_s64 types
• Previous by thread: Re: raid5: coding style cleanup / refactor
• Next by thread: PATCH: fix mismatch between usb-hid.c HUT find/search mapping and the HUT reference doc
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]