Re: [RFC] [PATCH] selective signal ptracing

> That might make sense if utrace ever looked like it would solve the
> questions about platforms like ARM

It certainly will.  The only difficult limitations have been in
communication and understanding.  Please don't perpetuate a generic red
herring without adding any content to the subject.


Thanks,
Roland
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [RFC] [PATCH] selective signal ptracing
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [BUG] Interesting race between cpufreq_ondemand and snd_atiixp
• Next by Date: Re: [AppArmor 39/45] AppArmor: Profile loading and manipulation, pathname matching
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] selective signal ptracing
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] selective signal ptracing
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]