Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bernd Paysan wrote:
On Friday 15 June 2007 13:49, Paulo Marques wrote:
I've contributed some code for the kernel (unlike yourself, AFAICT), and
believe me, I did so under GPL v2. The COPYING file is pretty much self
explanatory, so I didn't need to add any explicit license statement to
my code.

It's not, it's a personal comment from a misunderstanding of the GPL text. It's as valid as the "closed source kernel modules are legal" comment that was there some years ago.

These are not changes to the license text. These are just clarifications to help people understand the license. They don't change what the license already said.

People seem to forget that the kernel license in COPYING *never had* the
"v2 or later" clause. Never. Period.

It's there in section 9.

The section 9 is meant to explain how you select one version of the license in a program without having to copy the entire license text to it, i.e., in simple programs you can just put the small text, suggested by FSF at the bottom of the gpl, and have the version number there, and that should be enough to reference the entire text.

But COPYING *is* the entire text and starts with: "
		    GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
		       Version 2, June 1991"

so there is no confusion about the version.

[...]
And people who write kernel code are perfectly aware that the kernel
license is GPL v2 only, and always has been (except for the initial
linus license).

Wrong.

Why do you say "Wrong"? Have you contributed some code to the kernel thinking that the kernel was "v2 or later", only to find out later that it wasn't?

In case you haven't followed previous discussions, here's a pointer:

http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/9/22/176

The major kernel developers (and probably most of the total number of developers) are perfectly aware of the kernel license and chose GPL v2.

I'm getting pretty tired of listening to people that just _know_ what I should do with _my_ code. And people who treat kernel developers as morons who can't read a license.

We definitely need more Al Viro style comments on this thread ;)

--
Paulo Marques - www.grupopie.com

"The Mexicans have the Chupacabra. We have Al Viro. If you hear him roar, just _pray_ he's about to dissect somebody elses code than yours.. There is no point in running."

Linus Torvalds
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux