Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3

On Thursday 14 June 2007 22:47, David Schwartz wrote:
> The GPL does not require it to be easy in fact to modify the piece of
> software.

Yes it does, section 3: "The source code for a work means the preferred form 
of the work for making modifications to it." It then even lists that you 
need to provide all the scripts and stuff you use to make it easy for you.

Come on, *READ* the GPL, before you argue.

-- 
Bernd Paysan
"If you want it done right, you have to do it yourself"
http://www.jwdt.com/~paysan/

Attachment: pgpGKQL7dW9oq.pgp
Description: PGP signature

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
    • From: "David Schwartz" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • RE: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
    • From: "David Schwartz" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] Introduce compat_u64 and compat_s64 types
• Next by Date: [PATCH] block: always requeue !fs requests at the front
• Previous by thread: RE: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
• Next by thread: RE: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]