Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3

> If the two courts are in the same country there's usually a higher court 
> above both that can resolve this. But what if let's say the highest 
> court in the USA and the highest court in Germany would disagree on such 
> a matter?

It would be very unusual for both cases to proceed in parallel. The one
court will then strongly consider the decision of the other.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
    • From: Tarkan Erimer <[email protected]>
  • Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
    • From: Daniel Hazelton <[email protected]>
  • Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
  • Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
    • From: Daniel Hazelton <[email protected]>
  • Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/5] fallocate() implementation in i86, x86_64 and powerpc
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH, 2nd try] make disable_console_suspend runtime configurable
• Previous by thread: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
• Next by thread: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]