Re: beeping patch for debugging acpi sleep

Hi.

Wouldn't it be much more useful if it was unconditionally compiled in
and controlled instead by a sysfs entry? That way it will be far more
useful to $user who doesn't know or want to know how to compile and
install a kernel, but wants to do what they can to get provide helpful
debugging info and perhaps even get it going.

Yes, Pavel, I'll supply a patch if you (plural) agree.

Regards,

Nigel

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: beeping patch for debugging acpi sleep
    • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [BUG] acpi double resume and fail
    • From: Christian Leber <[email protected]>
  • Re: [BUG] acpi double resume and fail
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
  • beeping patch for debugging acpi sleep
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
  • Re: beeping patch for debugging acpi sleep
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/1] UML: fix missing non-blocking I/O, now DEBUG_SHIRQ works
• Next by Date: Re: [patch-mm 00/23] High resolution timer updates and x86_64 support
• Previous by thread: Re: beeping patch for debugging acpi sleep
• Next by thread: Re: beeping patch for debugging acpi sleep
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]