On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 03:27:43PM -0400, Kyle Moffett wrote: > SCENARIO 1: > > Program Thread: Library Thread: > fd = socket(AF_*, SOCK_*, 0); > fork(); > int x = FD_CLOEXEC; > fcntl(fd, F_SETFD, &x); BTW, regardless of anything else, in such situation this "library thread" would be better off by just having independent descriptors. We _can_ do that just fine. That is, if library code using such stuff would be OK with being a thread. Any specific examples one way or another? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
- From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
- From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
- From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
- From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
- From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] Documentation/CodingStyle: Add rules for goto labels (-v2)
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] [2.6.22] libata: fix probe time irq printouts
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
- Next by thread: Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
- Index(es):
 |