Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Mkay, I am convinced. Either cramfs should be based on a block device that does have direct_access() for xip, or the code needs to be forked. Looks like a sane approach to me.And for thus just wanting to take a quick glance, this is the diff vs an out of tree cramfs where uncompress.c and cramfs_fs_sb.h are merged into inode.c:
so long, Carsten - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.21] cramfs: add cramfs Linear XIP
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.21] cramfs: add cramfs Linear XIP
- From: "Jared Hulbert" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.21] cramfs: add cramfs Linear XIP
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.21] cramfs: add cramfs Linear XIP
- From: Carsten Otte <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.21] cramfs: add cramfs Linear XIP
- From: "Jared Hulbert" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.21] cramfs: add cramfs Linear XIP
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.21] cramfs: add cramfs Linear XIP
- From: "Jared Hulbert" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.21] cramfs: add cramfs Linear XIP
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.21] cramfs: add cramfs Linear XIP
- From: "Jared Hulbert" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.21] cramfs: add cramfs Linear XIP
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.21] cramfs: add cramfs Linear XIP
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.21] cramfs: add cramfs Linear XIP
- Prev by Date: Re: [stable] [patch 00/54] 2.6.21-stable review
- Next by Date: [patch 03/54] NOHZ: Rate limit the local softirq pending warning output
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2.6.21] cramfs: add cramfs Linear XIP
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2.6.21] cramfs: add cramfs Linear XIP
- Index(es):
 |