[Eric Sandeen - Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 12:51:34PM -0500]
| Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
| >[Eric Sandeen - Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 12:17:53PM -0500]
| >| Andrew Morton wrote:
| >|
| >| >Recursive lock_kernel() is OK.
| >|
| >| Oh, it is? Clearly I am not well versed in the BKL... that's probably a
| >| good thing.... :)
| >|
| >| Ok, let me look into it further. I changed lock_kernel to
| >| udf_lock_kernel to complain & backtrace if we re-lock, and it always
| >| immediately hung after that; I assumed that was it. I'll investigate
| >| further.
| >|
| >| -Eric
| >|
| >
| >Btw, Andrew is there any way to force kernel to use special UDF module
| >instead of compiled-in one? (Sorry for stupid question ;)
|
| Not if it's already built in (at least not with more hackery than it's
| worth...) - just rebuild your kernel w/ udf as a module.
|
| BTW my testcase before was bogus, that's not what's causing the lockup.
| I'll keep investigating now that I know what *not* to look for. ;-)
|
| -Eric
|
Thanks for answer
Cyrill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
