On Tue, 29 May 2007 13:44:42 -0500 Josh Boyer wrote:
> On 5/29/07, Randy Dunlap <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > > On Tue, 29 May 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Tue, 29 May 2007 14:07:01 -0400 (EDT) Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> On Tue, 29 May 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> kernel/sysctl.c:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> {
> > >>>> .ctl_name = FS_STATINODE,
> > >>>> .procname = "inode-state",
> > >>>> .data = &inodes_stat,
> > >>>> .maxlen = 7*sizeof(int), <-----
> > >>>> .mode = 0444,
> > >>>> .proc_handler = &proc_dointvec,
> > >>>> },
> > >>>>
> > >>>> akpm:/home/akpm> cat /proc/sys/fs/inode-state
> > >>>> 608039 178454 0 0 0 0 0
> > >>>>
> > >>>> So it _is_ used: to present those five zeroes. I think this is
> > >>>> for back-compatibility with some cretaceous-era kernel.
> > >>> ah, gotcha. well, i'll leave this up to someone else to do
> > >>> anything with if they are so inclined.
> > >> There's little to be done, except possibly put a /* comment */ on
> > >> the struct's dummy line so that we don't go thru this again in N
> > >> years.
> > >
> > > so, just to clarify, what *is* the value of those trailing five
> > > zeroes? andrew suggests it's to be backward-compatible with an old
> > > kernel, which doesn't make much sense to me. it would make more sense
> > > to say that that's backward-compatible with some old userspace app
> > > that always wants to see seven values and just ignores the last five.
> >
> > Agreed, it's for compat with some (unknown) userspace app that reads
> > /proc/sys/fs/inode-state and scans for 7 (or more than 2) numbers there.
> > The mantra is "don't break userspace," so we leave the numbers there...
>
> Couldn't you remove the dummy member and just have the proc entry
> print out 5 dummy zeros?
In theory someone could do that, but it would (a) require a comment
so that someone else didn't try to remove it 5 years from now and
(b) require more proc/sysctl code just for that one sysctl entry
since the sysctl entries are all table-driven right now and printing
5 zeros would require a new /proc/sys handler for just this one
sysctl.
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
