Re: Regression: USB is nfg after suspend/resume(RAM) cycle on Intel chipset

On Tue, 29 May 2007, Mark Lord wrote:
> 
> I didn't re-break the kernel to do the alt-sysrq thing,
> but I did reapply the b0rken commit plus your new patch (below).
> 
> So far, so good with that combination, thanks.

Ok, let's merge the fix them. Alan, can you send it up-stream with the 
proper commit message and sign-off?

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • [PATCH] USB: replace flush_workqueue with cancel_sync_work
    • From: Alan Stern <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: Regression: USB is nfg after suspend/resume(RAM) cycle on Intel chipset
    • From: Alan Stern <[email protected]>
  • Re: Regression: USB is nfg after suspend/resume(RAM) cycle on Intel chipset
    • From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [BUG] signal: multithread program returns with wrong errno on receiving SIGSTOP
• Next by Date: Re: Seeding /dev/random not working
• Previous by thread: Re: Regression: USB is nfg after suspend/resume(RAM) cycle on Intel chipset
• Next by thread: [PATCH] USB: replace flush_workqueue with cancel_sync_work
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]