Re: [PATCHSET 2.6.22-rc2-mm1] sysfs: reduce memory footprint of sysfs_dirent

On Tue, 29 May 2007 12:04:30 -0400,
"Dmitry Torokhov" <[email protected]> wrote:

> I think that #3 is a good idea as well - we have a lot of sysfs
> objects on any given system and slimming down sysfs benefits everyone.

Yes, and the added complexity is not that bad.

The patchset seems to work fine so far on the (small z/VM guest) system
I tested it a bit on; I'll try a huge (LPAR) system next.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCHSET 2.6.22-rc2-mm1] sysfs: reduce memory footprint of sysfs_dirent
    • From: Cornelia Huck <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCHSET 2.6.22-rc2-mm1] sysfs: reduce memory footprint of sysfs_dirent
    • From: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCHSET 2.6.22-rc2-mm1] sysfs: reduce memory footprint of sysfs_dirent
    • From: "Dmitry Torokhov" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/3] sysfs: slim down sysfs_dirent->s_active
• Next by Date: Re: JFFS2 using 'private' zlib header (was [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 6)
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCHSET 2.6.22-rc2-mm1] sysfs: reduce memory footprint of sysfs_dirent
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCHSET 2.6.22-rc2-mm1] sysfs: reduce memory footprint of sysfs_dirent
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]