Re: [patch] i386, numaq: enable TSCs again

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* William Lee Irwin III <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I remember. It was far beyond "slightly async;" they would drift 
>> minutes apart during reasonable amounts of uptime, though it would 
>> take at least several days to drift so far (I don't recall how long it 
>> took).

On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 10:31:53AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> yes, that's what i meant under 'slightly async'. Some AMD CPUs are like 
> that too and sched_clock() now handles that fine. So we should try my 
> patch.

Sorry, then. I took slight to mean something else. In any event I was
only quantifying things. I've no opinion whatsoever on the impact of
the code on NUMA-Q, only some recall of its operating characteristics.


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux