* Chris Friesen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> >CFS is fair even on SMP. Consider for example the worst-case
> >3-tasks-on-2-CPUs workload on a 2-CPU box:
> >
> > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
> > 2658 mingo 20 0 1580 248 200 R 67 0.0 0:56.30 loop
> > 2656 mingo 20 0 1580 252 200 R 66 0.0 0:55.55 loop
> > 2657 mingo 20 0 1576 248 200 R 66 0.0 0:55.24 loop
> >
> >66% of CPU time for each task. The 'TIME+' column shows a 2% spread
> >between the slowest and the fastest loop after just 1 minute of runtime
> >(and the spread gets narrower with time).
>
> Is there a way in CFS to tune the amount of time over which the load
> balancer is fair? (Of course there would be some overhead involved.)
it should be fair pretty fast (see the 10 seconds run of massive_intr) -
so it's not 1 minute (if you were worried about that).
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
