Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Fri, 18 May 2007, Tomas Carnecky wrote:
>> GameVoice is used for VoIP communication between players. It consists of
>> a software and the small pad with eight buttons and connectors for the
>> headset. One of the buttons can be used to mute the microphone, the
>> others are labeled '1' - '4', 'TEAM', 'ALL' and 'COMMAND'. The idea is
>> that you can have up to four 'groups' of players and communicate only to
>> certain groups by 'activating' the buttons, you can also speak to your
>> whole team or all players. The command button is used for voice commands
>> (for example, you press the button, say 'throw grenade' and the software
>> translates it to a predefined key sequence). That's more or less how
>> it's supposed to work.
>
> But all this is handled actually by userspace applications, right? Or do
> you want this whole functionality to go into a specialized kernel driver?
> Or does this require some interaction/processing between hardware and the
> driver?
There's no further processing needed in the kernel. The userspace
application would receive these input events and act accordingly, like:
read data from the soundcard and send it to the VoIP server, or only
certain channels based on which buttons are currently pressed etc.
> Well, if the only purpose of this device is to pass status of pressed
> buttons into userspace driver (which is the case, as far as I understand
> it), it's just broken that it has 05 0b (i.e. Telephony/Headset) in its
> report descriptor.
>
> Either fixing the report descriptor on the fly or adding a special quirk
> to force hid-input to claim the device would be needed. Would you care to
> create such patch?
I already thought about this option (to whitelist this particular
vendor/device ID as an hid-input device), but I first wanted some
feedback on the whole situation. As for the patch, I have zero knowledge
of the hid subsystem.. but if you give me a go on this, I'll try to dig
into the code and make a patch :)
> Or did I just get it wrong and the device has also other purposes that
> should be handled by the kernel driver, than just trivial mapping of a few
> buttons into corresponding input events?
This pad has no other purposes than just having eight buttons. Mapping
these buttons into input events is all that is needed to make a useful
userspace application for it.
Considering how many users actually have this device and try to get it
working under Linux (probably only me), I wouldn't be mad if you
rejected a patch. I don't even know if I will ever write an userspace
application for it! But, I have this device lying around on my table and
in my old Windows days it was quite useful, so I'd like to share my
findings with others.
tom
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
