On 5/18/07, Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]> wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 09:11:58AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> It's also somewhat a matter of *taste* (and hence subjective), if you
> _still_ don't get it, Matthew, then there's no point continuing this thread
> and trying to convince you ad infinitum.
Right. It's a matter of taste. What makes you think you have taste?
Well, my stand uptil now has been to consider as many options as
possible. I have certainly not married myself to just one particular way
of doing this -- but I bet that the one way that I do _dislike_, the dummy
module one, would not be found tasteful / best by most people around
(yourself included, as you say).
I don't think that the module solution is perfect. But abusing the
module parameters is a worse idea. sysfs just isn't a good fit for this,
according to my taste.
The whole point is to at least _consider_ other alternatives. And I've
found your attitude so far to have been extremely blocking / difficult.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
