Re: [PATCH] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending with tickless plip

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi

On one of my machines with tickless kernel and plip I get messages :

I bet this is a machine a P4 with Hyperthreading enabled ?

No, it's single Pentium 2. I have other Pentium MMX using plip, where I don't get these error messages, I don't know why.

Mikulas

NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08

always when using plip (on other machine with tickless kernel and plip I
get no errors). Thebug happens both on 2.6.21 and 2.6.22-rc1

This patch fixes that. Note that plip calls netif_rx neither from hardware
interrupt nor from ksoftirqd, so there is no one who would wake
ksoftirqd then. netif_tx calls only
__raise_softirq_irqoff(NET_RX_SOFTIRQ), which sets softirq bit, but
doesn't wake ksoftirqd.

Dave,

can we please get rid of __raise_softirq_irqoff() at all ? These micro
optimizations are causing more trouble than they are worth.

	tglx

Mikulas

Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <[email protected]

--- linux-2.6.22-rc1/net/core/dev.c_	Fri May 18 07:51:01 2007
+++ linux-2.6.22-rc1/net/core/dev.c	Fri May 18 07:51:06 2007
@@ -1117,7 +1117,7 @@
  		dev->quota += dev->weight;
  	else
  		dev->quota = dev->weight;
-	__raise_softirq_irqoff(NET_RX_SOFTIRQ);
+	raise_softirq_irqoff(NET_RX_SOFTIRQ);
  	local_irq_restore(flags);
  }
  EXPORT_SYMBOL(__netif_rx_schedule);


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux