On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 08:00:11PM +0000, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Following are two patches which have been sitting for some time in -mm.
> >
> > Where "some time" == "nearly six months".
> >
> > We need help considering, reviewing and testing this code, please.
>
> I did quick scan, and it looks ok. Plus, it means we can finally start
> using that old capabilities subsystem... so I think we should do it.
FWIW, I looked through it recently as well, and it looked reasonable enough
to me, though I'm not a security expert. I did have a question about
testing corner cases etc, which Serge has tried to address.
Serge, are you planning to post an update without STRICTXATTR ? That should
simplify the second patch.
Regards
Suparna
>
> Pavel
> --
> (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
> (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Suparna Bhattacharya ([email protected])
Linux Technology Center
IBM Software Lab, India
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
