Re: [VOYAGER] fix build broken by shift to smp_ops

James Bottomley wrote:
> Let me do it.
>
> These are the two patches, tested and working on Voyager.
>
> The order of application is
>
> i386-common-smp.patch
> i386-fix-voyager-build.patch
>   

Yep, looks fine to me.  The only difference from the ones I just posted
appears to be a little bit of whitespace.

    J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [VOYAGER] fix build broken by shift to smp_ops
    • From: James Bottomley <[email protected]>
  • Re: [VOYAGER] fix build broken by shift to smp_ops
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [VOYAGER] fix build broken by shift to smp_ops
    • From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
  • Re: [VOYAGER] fix build broken by shift to smp_ops
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [VOYAGER] fix build broken by shift to smp_ops
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [VOYAGER] fix build broken by shift to smp_ops
    • From: James Bottomley <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: How to access correctly serial port inside module?
• Next by Date: Re: Trivial string form cleanups
• Previous by thread: Re: [VOYAGER] fix build broken by shift to smp_ops
• Next by thread: USB adutux device number
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]