On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 15:00 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Well, let's get the build fix in place first and then we can feed
> > the cleanup in later on, in a more leisurely fashion?
> >
>
> If you like. Are all the Voyager users standing outside your office
> with pitchforks, demanding satisfaction?
That could be arranged ... The Xensource offices are just up the road
from Google, you know if I wanted to kill two birds with one stone.
Seriously, though, although I tolerate voyager breakage through the
merge window, I actively try to clean it up and have a working voyager
for the next release. There's no real excuse for not fixing build
breakage. How it's done, I don't really care. The only blocker for the
two patch smp consolidation + voyager fix was Andi ... if he's relaxing
that, then we can go that route.
Until this is fixed, there are going to be -rc testers firing off build
failure reports, which I think we'd all like to
James
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
