On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 07:50:16PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Otherwise, as Jeff mentions, you're doing a redundant assignment
> > in the else branch.
>
> Hmmm... I'm feeling very dense today. At that point, class is either
> ATA_DEV_ATA or ATA_DEV_ATAPI. The if-else clause tries to flip between
> the two.
>
> 1. if class == ATA_DEV_ATA, the 'if' test succeeds and "class =
> ATA_DEV_ATAPI" runs, so it flips correctly.
>
> 2. if class == ATA_DEV_ATAPI, the 'if' test fails and "class =
> ATA_DEV_ATA" runs, so it flips correctly.
>
> What am I missing here? Feel free to scream at me and hammer me into
> senses. :-)
actually, I think I'm denser today. Ignore that last mail.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
