Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> I'd be happy to have them. While it's not the nicest API in the world
> it's in Posix and we have to support it at the library level, so we
> should better get it right.
>
> I'd like to avoid having a big swithc statement in every filesystem,
> though, instead of we should have a table-driven approach instead
> where each filesystem defines one table (or multiple ones when it
> supports subtypes with different limits) and just sets a pointer in
> the superblock to it.
>
This is starting to sound an awful lot like statfs(). Maybe we could
create a new statfs call which takes a buffer size input (so that we can
add new fields as time goes on) and which returns the necessary information?
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
