Re: [GIT PULL] MMC updates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 10 May 2007, Pierre Ossman wrote:

> You seem to be the source of this workaround, and also the maintainer of
> PXA.

Well... I used to.

But the only MMC capable PXA hardware in working conditions I have 
access to at the moment is PXA255 based which doesn't suffer from this 
erratum.

> Pierre Ossman wrote:
> > Russell King wrote:
> >   
> >> See the comments immediately above and below its use.
> >>
> >> Welcome to buggy hardware.
> >>
> >>   
> >>     
> >
> > I've read through the erratum, and to me it seems like the bug affects
> > all long replies, not just these codes. So I think the code should be
> > fixed to look at the response flag, not the opcode.
> >
> > Do you have hardware so that you can test such a change?
> >
> >   
> 
> I guess the same question goes to you. :)

People in better position than I currently do to test a fix are most 
likely to be found on lak.


Nicolas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux