On 5/10/07, Alan Cox <[email protected]> wrote:
"blobs of crap" - in whose opinion. Yours. So you don't want the kernel to mention things you personally don't approve of. Thats straight forward censorship and has no place in free software.
Out of kernel code comes and goes, so why mention it in-tree? Besides, what's wrong with the suggested "can be used for tracing or performance accounting?" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch 07/10] Linux Kernel Markers - Documentation
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 07/10] Linux Kernel Markers - Documentation
- References:
- [patch 00/10] Linux Kernel Markers for 2.6.21-mm2
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
- [patch 07/10] Linux Kernel Markers - Documentation
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 07/10] Linux Kernel Markers - Documentation
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 07/10] Linux Kernel Markers - Documentation
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 07/10] Linux Kernel Markers - Documentation
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 07/10] Linux Kernel Markers - Documentation
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- [patch 00/10] Linux Kernel Markers for 2.6.21-mm2
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] net: trivial MLX4_DEBUG dependency fix.
- Next by Date: [BUG] Re: mm snapshot broken-out-2007-05-10-03-06.tar.gz uploaded
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch 07/10] Linux Kernel Markers - Documentation
- Next by thread: Re: [patch 07/10] Linux Kernel Markers - Documentation
- Index(es):
 |