On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:53:31 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > scx200_i2c does depend on i2c-algo-bit so there is really very little > code inside scx200_i2c itself. Does the new driver replace > i2c-algo-bit as well or does it use it? It uses it. -- Jean Delvare - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [PATCH v3] Bitbanging i2c bus driver using the GPIO API
- From: Jean Delvare <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH v3] Bitbanging i2c bus driver using the GPIO API
- From: [email protected] (Lennart Sorensen)
- Re: [PATCH v3] Bitbanging i2c bus driver using the GPIO API
- From: Jean Delvare <[email protected]>
- Re: Bitbanging i2c bus driver using the GPIO API
- From: "Jordan Crouse" <[email protected]>
- Re: Bitbanging i2c bus driver using the GPIO API
- From: Jean Delvare <[email protected]>
- Re: Bitbanging i2c bus driver using the GPIO API
- From: [email protected] (Lennart Sorensen)
- Re: Bitbanging i2c bus driver using the GPIO API
- From: "Jordan Crouse" <[email protected]>
- Re: Bitbanging i2c bus driver using the GPIO API
- From: [email protected] (Lennart Sorensen)
- Re: Bitbanging i2c bus driver using the GPIO API
- From: Jean Delvare <[email protected]>
- Re: Bitbanging i2c bus driver using the GPIO API
- From: "Jordan Crouse" <[email protected]>
- Re: Bitbanging i2c bus driver using the GPIO API
- From: [email protected] (Lennart Sorensen)
- Re: [PATCH v3] Bitbanging i2c bus driver using the GPIO API
- Prev by Date: Re: [-mm patch] do_revoke error handling (was Re: 2.6.21-mm1)
- Next by Date: Re: cpufreq longhaul locks up
- Previous by thread: Re: Bitbanging i2c bus driver using the GPIO API
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] pci quirks: Sort out the VIA mess once and for all (hopefully)
- Index(es):
 |