Re: [patch]clarification of coding style regarding conditional statements with two branches

Am Freitag, 4. Mai 2007 16:48 schrieb Jiri Slaby:
> Why, what's wrong with
> if (condition) {
>         do_this();
>         do_that();
> } else
>         otherwise();
> 
> ? It's more readable/nicer in my eyes than

Than I am afraid we need to agree to disagree. But then I would
insist that neither side give the other a hard to time over this issue.

	Regards
		Oliver
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch]clarification of coding style regarding conditional statements with two branches
    • From: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch]clarification of coding style regarding conditional statements with two branches
    • From: Oliver Neukum <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch]clarification of coding style regarding conditional statements with two branches
    • From: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch 14/22] pollfs: pollable futex
• Next by Date: mkfs.ext2 triggerd RAM corruption
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch]clarification of coding style regarding conditional statements with two branches
• Next by thread: Re: [patch]clarification of coding style regarding conditional statements with two branches
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]