Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 08:44:14 -0700 Randy Dunlap <[email protected]> wrote:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 07:35:00 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes wrote:
Only declare mega_proc_dir_entry() in CONFIG_PROC_FS. We should call
mega_create_proc_entry() only in this configuration so make sure it's defined
if we call it.
Only define mega_adapinq() in CONFIG_PROC_FS. mega_internal_dev_inquiry()
and mega_print_inquiry() were never declared without CONFIG_PROC_FS so
make sure we don't have prototypes for them if we aren't going to define
them.
Move the declaration of 'buf' in mega_remove_one() because we only use it
in the CONFIG_PROC_FS case.
Just noting the presence of:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21-rc7/2.6.21-rc7-mm2/broken-out/megaraid-fix-warnings-when-config_proc_fs=n.patch
That patch has been submitted fourteen times in the past year, and was
completely ignored each time.
Oh, and that SCSI patches need to go to the linux-scsi mailing list.
There seem to be little point in doing that.
Yes, I guess I was speaking theory instead of reality.
I suppose that one alternative is for you to merge those long-queued
patches instead of sending them on to linux-scsi over and over again.
--
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
