Re: [patch 00/33] 2.6.20-stable review

On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 06:15:54PM +0800, Wu, Bryan wrote:
> 
> You know for some customer's product, they want to use the stable and
> long term support kernel instead to use the latest one. 

Then they should get that support from a vendor, not from the kernel.org
releases :)

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch 00/33] 2.6.20-stable review
    • From: Bryan WU <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch 00/33] 2.6.20-stable review
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 00/33] 2.6.20-stable review
    • From: "Wu, Bryan" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [linux-pm] driver power operations (was Re: suspend2 merge)
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 01/14] sysfs: fix i_ino handling in sysfs
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch 00/33] 2.6.20-stable review
• Next by thread: Re: [patch 00/33] 2.6.20-stable review
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]