Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)

On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 14:09 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> Yes.  Still, I'd like to rework your patch to deal with ACPI without
> introducing hibernate_ops .  I'm going to do this later today if you don't
> mind. :-)

Not at all :) That's why I actually sent it out instead of just saying
"well I give up it breaks user.c"

johannes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

---

• References:
  • Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
  • Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
    • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
  • Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
    • From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
  • Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
    • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
• Next by Date: [patch 06/10] unprivileged mounts: put declaration of put_filesystem() in fs.h
• Previous by thread: Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
• Next by thread: Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]