[email protected] wrote:
As I understand it, the default Reiser4 DOES NOT USE any compression at
all, not even tail compression,
^tail compression^tail conversion
Reiser4 does use tail conversion by default.
but saves space by eliminating block
alignment wastage (tail compression is an option).
So lets LOSE the statistics that involve compression. The results now
look like this:
.-------------------------.
| FILESYSTEM | TIME |DISK |
| TYPE |(secs)|USAGE|
.-------------------------.
|REISER4 | 3462 | 692 |
|EXT2 | 4092 | 816 |
|JFS | 4225 | 806 |
|EXT4 | 4408 | 816 |
|EXT3 | 4421 | 816 |
|XFS | 4625 | 779 |
|REISER3 | 6178 | 793 |
|FAT32 |12342 | 988 |
|NTFS-3g |10414 | 772 |
.-------------------------.
These results are still EXTREMELY GOOD for REISER4.
Everything is not so simple in the science of testing..
Would you please change direction of your activity to stressing
instead of benchmarking? Caught oopses would have great value..
OK?
Regards,
Edward.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
