Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, v3

On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 10:47:45AM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Siddha, Suresh B wrote:
> > Anyhow, this is a straight forward optimization and needs to be done. Do you
> > have any specific concerns?
> 
> Yes there should not be contention on per cpu data in principle. The 
> point of per cpu data is for the cpu to have access to contention free 
> cachelines.
> 
> If the data is contented then it should be moved out of per cpu data and properly 
> placed to minimize contention. Otherwise we will get into cacheline 
> aliases (__read_mostly in per cpu??) etc etc in the per cpu areas.

yes, we were planning to move this to a different percpu section, where
all the elements in this new section will be cacheline aligned(both
at the start, aswell as end)

thanks,
suresh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, v3
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, v3
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, v3
    • From: William Lee Irwin III <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, v3
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, v3
    • From: William Lee Irwin III <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, v3
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, v3
    • From: William Lee Irwin III <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, v3
    • From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, v3
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, v3
    • From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, v3
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [OOPS 2.6.21-rc7-mm1] kernel BUG at fs/sysfs/inode.c:272 (sysfs_drop_dentry)
• Next by Date: Re: Pagecache: find_or_create_page does not call a proper page allocator function
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, v3
• Next by thread: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, v3
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]