Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, v3

On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 12:24:17PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Mark the runqueues ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp to avoid false sharing.
> 
> False sharing for a per cpu data structure? Are we updating that 
> structure from other processors?

yes. during a remote process wakeup.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch] CFS scheduler, v3
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, v3
    • From: William Lee Irwin III <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, v3
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [REPORT] cfs-v4 vs sd-0.44
• Next by Date: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, v3
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, v3
• Next by thread: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, v3
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]