Re: Sleep during spinlock in TPM driver

On Sun, 22 Apr 2007, Parag Warudkar wrote:

> @@ -1097,8 +1097,13 @@
> 
>   	/* Driver specific per-device data */
>   	chip = kzalloc(sizeof(*chip), GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (chip == NULL)
> +	devname = kmalloc(DEVNAME_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> + +	if (chip == NULL || devname == NULL) {

Hi,

this line looks bogus to me.

-- 
Jiri Kosina
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Sleep during spinlock in TPM driver
    • From: Parag Warudkar <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: Sleep during spinlock in TPM driver
    • From: Parag Warudkar <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] use spinlock instead of binary mutex in idt77252 driver
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] use spinlock instead of binary mutex in idt77252 driver
• Previous by thread: Re: Sleep during spinlock in TPM driver
• Next by thread: Re: Sleep during spinlock in TPM driver
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]